从391似乎是源于1880年2月香港商会的一次全体会议，当时商会讨论了在香港流通日本日元的必要性。在那次会议上，17票赞成流通日元，只有纳尔逊先生一人反对。据称，他的演讲（据说没有被完全报道）中对皮特曼先生作出了不友好的评论，皮特曼先生是日本政府的商业代理人，也是鸦片农场主的欧洲代理人。后者目前在日本，但人们普遍认为，他将纳尔逊先生无缘无故的攻击归咎于他将鸦片农场主的一些金融业务从纳尔逊先生担任经理的银行转移到东方银行，理由是纳尔逊先生的做法有些投机。署理总督在附函中指出，在针对纳尔逊先生的刑事诉讼中，纳尔逊先生没有通过民事诉讼，而是阻止了利特南先生亲自为他对皮特曼先生的指控辩护。
6. 纳尔逊先生暗示总检察长拒绝给予他特别陪审团，是因为...
> 参见1880年11月gre日第189号函件的附件。
18923
E
从
391
seems to have
arisen
out
of a general
Chamber pressed
meeting of the Hongkong Chamber of
Commerce in
February 1880 when the
on sne
the necessity of
matting the Japanese Yen current in
Hongkong. At that meeting the voting
was seventeen to
one in
favour of the
Japanese Yen, the one dissentient being Mr. Nelson. In the course. of his speech
(which it is alleged
was
not fully
reported) he made remarks about Mr.
Pitman, who is well known as
a
commercial agent of the Japanese Government and the European agent of the Opium Farmer, which were
not
very friendly
to Mr Fitman. The latter gentleman is Japan, but it is generally
now in
>
See Enclosure in, despatch n. 189 of gre November, 1880.
18923
Out
understood that he attributed Mr. Nelson's
unprovoked attack upon him to the fact that he had withdrawn some financial business of the Opium termer
from
the Bank of which Mr Nelson
the manager,
was
to the Oriental Bank, on the
ground that Mr Nelson
was somewhat
speculative. The Chief Justice, in the enclosed letter, points out that in
the criminal law against Mr.
invoking Pitmans, instead of proceeding by a
civil action, Mr. Nelson prevented M Letinan from personally justifying his
charges against him.
6.
Mr Nelson's insinuation
that the Attorney General declined to give him a special jury
because Mer
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.